Our very own investigation centers on the relationship between one or two head predictor details-actual members of the family for the Myspace and engagement for the Myspace Relationship Maintenance Habits – and you may one another general and you may Fb-specific bridging public financing. To check on the connection ranging from both of these different connecting personal investment, manage variables, while the predictors we describe a lot more than, i ran a series of nested OLS regressions.
In the regression predicting Facebook-specific bridging social capital, the control variables accounted for 5.4% of the variance, with gender (?=.207, p<.001) and self-esteem (?=.098, p<.05) emerging as significant, such that women and those with higher self-esteem reported higher perceived Facebook bridging social capital. The addition of the Facebook usage variables-minutes on Facebook, total Facebook Friends, and actual friends-increased the R 2 to .131, with minutes (?=.144, p<.01) and actual friends (?=.218, p<.001) positively predicting Facebook bridging social capital, supporting H1a. 569, p<.001) increased the model's R 2 to .394 and provided support for H2a. Full results are presented in Table 2.
FRMB assesses the fresh new extent to which victims statement it engage in facts that laws focus on and you will intentionally nurture dating towards site; these types of activities were replying to Friends’ implicit otherwise explicit funding requests and you will creating “happy birthday celebration” into a good Buddy’s Wall structure
In the regression predicting general bridging social capital, the control variables accounted for 9.3% of the variance; as with Facebook-specific bridging social capital, gender (?=.182, p<.001) and self-esteem (?=.255, p<.001) were significant predictors. The addition of the time and Friends variables increased the R 2 to .168. Total Facebook Friends (?=.118, p<.05) emerged as a significant predictor in this model; however, the impact of actual friends (?=.190, p<.001) on general bridging social capital was stronger, supporting H1b. Adding Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors to the model increased the R 2 to .229, and the significant positive relationship between FRMB and bridging social capital (?=.278, p<.001) provided support for H2b. See Table 3 for the full regression model.
Our research question probed the relationship between the number of “actual” friends and users’ engagement in relationship maintenance activities (FRMB), as they relate to bridging social capital. First, we conducted an OLS regression (see Model 4 in Tables 2 and 3) using the same variables as used in previous analyses as well as an interaction term (actual friends by FRMB). The interaction term was significant in both the general (?=?.571, p<.05) and Facebook-specific (?=?.857, p<.001) bridging models, suggesting that the impact of FRMB on bridging social capital may be moderated by users' reported number of actual friends in their Facebook network. The significant negative term indicates that for Facebook users who report fewer actual friends on Facebook, greater engagement in FRMB was correlated with a larger increase in bridging social capital than for users who reported more actual friends on the site.
To further examine this finding, we conducted a simple slopes analysis ( Aiken West, 1991). We observed effects of FRMB on bridging social capital at three levels of actual friends: (1) reported value, (2) reported value minus one standard deviation, and (3) reported value plus one standard deviation. Results indicated that FRMB’s influence on both Facebook-specific and general bridging social capital significantly differed across the three measurement points for actual friends. For all three levels, greater engagement in FRMB was correlated with higher perceived bridging social capital (see Figure 1). However, those with the fewest actual friends saw the greatest gains in bridging social capital as their engagement in FRMB increased. An analysis of variance shows this difference across the three levels of actual friends is significant for Facebook-specific bridging social capital, F(82)= p<.001, and trends towards significance with general bridging social capital, F(86)=3.204 p=.077.
Discussion
Within this data, we explore the relationship anywhere between connecting societal financing as well as 2 parts regarding Twitter explore due to questionnaire study built-up away from an example away from U.S. adults. We working several separate steps of connecting personal funding-you to definitely determining the pros regarding the relations with your circle regarding Fb Loved ones and almost every other targeting your relationships together with or the girl whole social networking. Guaranteeing and you can broadening into earlier in the day degree from Fb fool around with ( age.g., Burke ainsi que al., 2011; Ellison et al., 2011), we discover high self-confident relationships anywhere between these types of procedures off bridging personal financial support and you may the quantity of “actual” Myspace family unit members https://datingranking.net/it/valuta-il-mio-appuntamento/ professionals declare that he’s got as well as their wedding into the Fb Relationships Repairs Behaviors. This study leads to our understanding of new social personality out-of SNS explore because of the (1) identifying how users’ engagement on public brushing behaviors recognized significantly more than relate solely to attitudes regarding connecting personal investment-one another within Facebook Friend circle in addition to their social networking a whole lot more broadly-and you may explicating the latest interpersonal, structural, and notice-filtering fictional character hence subscribe to that it relationships; (2) examining the differences between seen total and you can “actual” Members of the family on the website in relation to connecting social investment effects; and you will (3) exploring differences in attitudes away from standard connecting personal resource between users and you can nonusers of the web site.